REKONSEPTULISASI VALIDITAS PENILAIAN PAI MELALUI PERSPEKTIF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT PADA KURIKULUM MERDEKA https://doi.org/10.35719/ec4chb65 Authors Akhsani Ulvatun Ni'mah Universitas Al-Falah As-Sunniyah Kencong Jember Moh. Sahlan Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Validitas Asesmen, Konstruktif Alignment, Pendidikan Agama Islam, Kurikulum Merdeka, Capaian Pembelajaran Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles In Islamic Religious Education (PAI), assessment validity is often viewed as the technical quality of assessment instruments, with less attention given to its connection to learning design. This conceptual study reevaluates assessment validity through the lens of Constructive Alignment in the Merdeka Curriculum. Using a qualitative conceptual approach, the study draws on theories, policy documents, and recent research in learning assessment and Islamic education. The analysis shows that technically valid instruments may not reflect intended learning outcomes if assessments are not aligned with curriculum aims and classroom experiences. The study therefore proposes redefining assessment validity as the degree of alignment among learning outcomes, learning experiences, and assessment. This approach shifts the focus from instrument quality to the coherence of the entire learning process, supplying a foundation for more holistic and meaningful assessment practices in Islamic Religious EducationIn Islamic Religious Education (PAI), assessment validity is often viewed as the technical quality of assessment instruments, with less attention given to its connection to learning design. This conceptual study reevaluates assessment validity through the lens of Constructive Alignment in the Merdeka Curriculum. Using a qualitative conceptual approach, the study draws on theories, policy documents, and recent research in learning assessment and Islamic education. The analysis shows that technically valid instruments may not reflect intended learning outcomes if assessments are not aligned with curriculum aims and classroom experiences. The study therefore proposes redefining assessment validity as the degree of alignment among learning outcomes, learning experiences, and assessment. This approach shifts the focus from instrument quality to the coherence of the entire learning process, supplying a foundation for more holistic and meaningful assessment practices in Islamic Religious Education. Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Alfiyah, N., Zuhriyah, I. A., & Chalishah, N. D. (2025). Validity and Reliability Analysis: Measuring the Accuracy and Consistency of Instruments for the Evaluation of Islamic Religious Education Tests. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(3), 2672–2679. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i3.7230 Atchison, D., Garet, M. S., Smith, T. M., & Song, M. (2022). The Validity of Measures of Instructional Alignment With State Standards Based on Surveys of Enacted Curriculum. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221098761 Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. Boini, B., Sahrul, S., Asmanah, A., & Sumin, S. (2024). Analisis Instrumen Tes Penilaian Pendidikan Agama Islam Menggunakan Tes Teori Klasik. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v5i001.445 Brown, G. T. L. (2022). The Past, Present and Future of Educational Assessment: A Transdisciplinary Perspective. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633 Chong, J., Mokshein, S. E., & Mustapha, R. (2021). A Content Validity Study for Vocational Teachers’ Assessment Literacy Instrument (VoTAL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V11-I4/9547 Cizek, G. J., Kosh, A. E., & Toutkoushian, E. K. (2018). Gathering and Evaluating Validity Evidence: The Generalized Assessment Alignment Tool. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55(4), 477–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12189 Dewi, M. N., Masritawati, M., Fatimah, N., & Asma, S. (2025). Integrating Affective–Spiritual Assessment in Education: Instrument Development and Implementation. El-Rusyd, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.58485/elrusyd.v10i2.447 Fikri, M., Firdayeni, & Jamilus. (2025). Transformasi Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam dari Penilaian Kognitif ke Pembentukan Karakter Peserta Didik. YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya, 5(6), 7045–7057. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v5i6.8504 Hafiz, S. R., Nasution, A. F., Rahayu, W., Muliadi, & Sitompul, C. M. (2024). Teacher Problems in Implementing the Independent Curriculum in Islamic Religious Education Subjects. Competitive: Journal of Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.58355/competitive.v3i1.38 Hanafi, S. S. A. N., Fadhila, A. S., & Bashith, A. (2025). Pendekatan Penilaian Autentik dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI): The Authentic Assessment Approach in the Evaluation of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Learning. EDUCAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v9i2.14679 Havista, N., Zahara, & Rahman, T. (2025). Strategi Guru PAI dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(2), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i2.1009 Hoeve, K. B. (2022). A Validity Framework for Accountability: Educational Measurement and Language Testing. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00153-2 Irmayanti, A. P., Remiswal, Khadijah, & Syamsi. (2024). Revealing the Practice of Norm-referenced Assessment and Criterion-referenced Assessment in Islamic Education Learning: A Case Study at SMPN 24 Padang. At-Ta’lim: Media Informasi Pendidikan Islam, 23(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.29300/attalim.v23i1.4327 Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing Conceptual Articles: Four Approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 Lestari, A. D., Alghifari, R. I., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2025). Pendekatan Komprehensif Terhadap Umpan Balik Dalam Evaluasi PAI: Antara Capaian, Refleksi, dan Intervensi. Muróbbî: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.52431/murobbi.v9i2.3909 Meijer, H., Brouwer, J., Hoekstra, R., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2022). Exploring Construct and Consequential Validity of Collaborative Learning Assessment in Higher Education. Small Group Research, 53(6), 891–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964221095545 Mulyani, R., Karimullah, Wahab, & Sobirin, S. (2024). Characteristics of Islamic Religious Education Assessment Instruments. At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.439 Nanda Hanafi, S. S. A., & Bashith, A. (2025). Pendekatan Penilaian Autentik dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI). Educan, 9(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.21111/educan.v9i2.14679 Nasrullah. (2025). Menggugat Model Evaluasi Kognitif dalam PAI sebagai Penghambat Pendewasaan Iman. AN-NUR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(2), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.65802/an-nur.v1i2.67 Newton, P. (2023). Book Announcement: Validity in Educational and Psychological Assessment. Apollo – University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.100296 NurAzizi, M. H., Alfauzi, A. R., & Bashith, A. (2025). Assessment Strategy Based on Validity and Reliability in Determining the Minimum Completeness Criteria for Islamic Religious Education. Inteligensi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.33366/ilg.v8i1.7248 Nurmasihin, N., Khadijah, I., & Suherman, U. (2025). Thematic-Integrative Paradigm of Curriculum and PAI Learning Development in Madrasahs or Schools (Theoretical Study). FAJAR Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.56013/fj.v5i2.4519 Nursichati, Susongko, P., & Mulyono, T. (2025). Critical Thinking Ability Test Instrument Design with Validity Test Pearson Correlation. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(1), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i1.642 Park, C. (2025). Transformation in Education and the Purposes and Practices of Educational Assessment Revisited. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.30916/KERA.63.5.249 Qolbi, S. K. (2025). Pengembangan Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI di Era Modern pada Kampus Politeknik Berbasis Pemikiran Imam Al Ghazali. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 4(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v4i1.210 Rachmaningtyas, N. A., Prihono, E. W., & Naqsyahbandi, F. (2025). Transformation of Islamic Religious Education Learning through Religious Literacy Assessment Instruments. Al-Misbah: Jurnal Islamic Studies, 13(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.26555/almisbah.v13i2.14274 Rahma, C. D. (2025). Pendidikan karakter dalam PAI yang terpinggirkan oleh fokus pada hafalan. An-Nur, 1(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.65802/an-nur.v1i2.36 Riaz, K., & Ghuffar, A. (2025). Curriculum–Assessment Alignment in BISE Exams: An Analysis Using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Catalyst Journal of Social Sciences Research, 3(4), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.63878/cjssr.v3i4.1481 Ridho, A. R., Sayidah, A., & Mustofa, A. Al. (2025). Instrumen Penilaian Holistik: Fondasi Evaluasi Hasil Belajar yang Valid dan Objektif. TSAQOFAH, 6(1), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8341 Rohimah, S. A., Mutmainnah, Khoeriyah, S. F., Putri, M. B., & Najmudin, D. (2025). Evaluasi Non-Tes Sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Karakter dan Keterampilan Abad 21. Celebes Journal of Elementary Education, 3(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.31605/cjee.v3i1.5134 Rust, J. (2023). Discussion Piece: The Psychometric Principles of Assessment. Research Matters, 35, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.100386 Sangadah, S., Dewi, R. R., & Ridho, A. R. (2025). Mengukur Ruh dan Raga: Peran Evaluasi Holistik PAI dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. TSAQOFAH: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 6(1), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8441 Schellekens, L. H. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Van der Schaaf, M. F. F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Bok, H. G. J. (2023). Between Theory and Practice: Educators’ Perceptions on Assessment Quality Criteria and Its Impact on Student Learning. Frontiers in Education, 8(1), 1147213. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213 Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Evaluasi Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif: Sebuah Studi Pustaka. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5599–5609. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1747 Sulastri, E. (2025). Basic Principles in Quality PAI Learning Assessment. JKA, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26811/sfe2e812 Sunandar, A., Supriyadi, & Hilmiyati, F. (2024). INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PSIKOMOTORIK: Analisis Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Paris Langkis, 5(1), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.37304/paris.v5i1.17483 Syamsi, Junaidi, R., Hidayat, B., Syofyandi, R., & Julhadi. (2025). Evaluating the Quality of Objective and Essay Tests in Cognitive Assessment. El-Rusyd, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.58485/elrusyd.v10i2.492 Tóth, E., & Csapó, B. (2022). Teachers’ Beliefs about Assessment and Accountability. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09396-w Ulfa, M., & Pashayev, A. (2025). Performance Assessment in Islamic Religious Education Learning. Green Philosophy, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.70062/greenphilosophy.v2i4.250 Utari, A. S., Syahputra, T. A., & Halimah, S. (2024). Analisis Kesesuaian SKL, KI, KD, dan Indikator Kurikulum PAI. Al-Ihda’: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 19(2), 1448–1459. https://doi.org/10.55558/alihda.v19i2.138 Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2015). Constructive Alignment: An Outcomes-Based Approach to Teaching Anatomy. In L. K. Chan & W. Pawlina (Eds.), Teaching Anatomy BT - Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide (pp. 31–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_4 Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press. Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). (2006). Educational Measurement (4th ed.). Praeger Publishers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493398 Brown, C. R., & Moore, J. L. (1994). Construct Validity and Context Dependency of the Assessment of Practical Skills in an Advanced Level Biology Examination. Research in Science & Technological Education, 12(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514940120107 Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781 Messick, S. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Persons’ Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry Into Score Meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. Submitted 2026-07-01 Downloads Full Text (English) 2026-07-01 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Teaching Section Articles